Attorney Caught on Tape Raises Ethical Questions

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

Remember that shake-up at Iowa Workforce Development a couple of years ago?  The director at the time, Teresa Wahlert, handed down new mandates to the Administrative Law Judges, some of whom quit and others were fired.

One of the terminated judges, Susan Ackerman, appealed the decision. A hearing was held, but the arbitrator, John Sandy, an attorney in Spirit Lake, ruled in favor of the state, saying it had “just cause and proper cause do (sic) terminate” Ackerman.

But something happened after the hearing that has prompted Ackerman to file a complaint with the Iowa Public Employee Relations Board. She claims Sandy acted unethically, saying there’s a tape recording that proves it.

Sandy recorded the hearing. He also unknowingly left his device going, which recorded his car ride from Des Moines to his home.

ackerman sandy mugs

On the recording, Sandy is heard discussing the case with a friend on the phone.

The recording raises questions about Sandy’s impartiality. During the phone conversation, Sandy recounts reading about the case in The Des Moines Register, which contradicts his statement to the parties in the arbitration hearing: “I don’t know anything about this case.”

Mike Cormack is the Chairman of the Iowa Public Employee Relations Board, the organization that oversees arbitration hearings between the state and its employees. He says arbitrators are expected to come into the hearing with an open mind.

“What people would expect of a fair judge or any public official, that’s what we would seek to have,” Cormack said.

Discussing the case with others prior to ruling on it also raises ethical questions, as does this comment from Sandy on the recording:

“It went perfectly well for me. I get paid … in fact, I got paid to drive three and a half hours this morning that I didn’t drive.”

Cormack says the board also expects its arbitrators to act in a professional manner, and Ackerman feels Sandy was not only unprofessional but unfair.

In her six-page complaint to PERB, Ackerman claims: “The decision strongly suggests Mr. Sandy wrote it based on an opinion and without reviewing the evidence that was provided … I want the right to be heard and I want Mr. Sandy held accountable for his substandard decision.”

Ackerman will get that chance at a public hearing May 24 when a hearing will be held to determine if Sandy acted unethically and be allowed to remain an arbitrator for PERB. A petition has also been filed in Polk County District Court to vacate Sandy’s decision.

Sandy declined to comment for this story.

Copyright 2021 Nexstar Media Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.


Latest News

More News